Comments on: I thought I was better… http://www.preteristpodcast.com/index.php/2009/07/01/i-thought-i-was-better/ This podcast examines Biblical eschatology from a preterist perspective. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:16:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Dee Dee Warren http://www.preteristpodcast.com/index.php/2009/07/01/i-thought-i-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-377 Dee Dee Warren Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:07:27 +0000 http://www.preteristpodcast.com/?p=121#comment-377 I will definitely add that to my index. I will definitely add that to my index.

]]> By: Jay Rogers http://www.preteristpodcast.com/index.php/2009/07/01/i-thought-i-was-better/comment-page-1/#comment-372 Jay Rogers Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:46:58 +0000 http://www.preteristpodcast.com/?p=121#comment-372 My friend Gavin Quill, who used to write frequently for the Forerunner, did a series on preterism in his church about a month ago. He wwas asked to present the preterist view, but the elders of the church had no idea that he would present it as though it were credible and it go a lot of discussion going. It's interesting too that in the message he says he always knew what preterism was, but never considered it too much until he was asked to do this presentation -- and in arguing the case he convinced himself that it was a lot more credible than he imagined. On of the podcast messages resides here: <a href="http://www.gracewest.org/downloads/05_31_2009_ABF.mp3" title="Intro to Preterism - 2" rel="nofollow"> Part one is available only as notes (a glitch in the audio recording) with the whole series here: <a href="http://www.gracewest.org/content.cfm?id=2041" title="Are We Witnessing The End Times?" rel="nofollow"> Just though you should know since you are the collector of all things preterist. Since you are not doing the Podcast until you feel better, maybe people can listen to this instead? My friend Gavin Quill, who used to write frequently for the Forerunner, did a series on preterism in his church about a month ago. He wwas asked to present the preterist view, but the elders of the church had no idea that he would present it as though it were credible and it go a lot of discussion going. It’s interesting too that in the message he says he always knew what preterism was, but never considered it too much until he was asked to do this presentation — and in arguing the case he convinced himself that it was a lot more credible than he imagined.

On of the podcast messages resides here:

Part one is available only as notes (a glitch in the audio recording) with the whole series here:

Just though you should know since you are the collector of all things preterist. Since you are not doing the Podcast until you feel better, maybe people can listen to this instead?

]]>